PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLD vs. QCLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RBLD vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RBLD vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
10.02%13.99%17.94%19.36%-9.87%12.98%0.51%12.81%-21.72%22.95%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
5.17%31.81%-18.86%-10.02%-30.37%-3.21%184.00%42.65%-12.38%32.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLD achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN's 5.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RBLD has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 7.92%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.


RBLD

1D
1.05%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
10.02%
6M
8.90%
1Y
25.57%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
7.92%

QCLN

1D
0.90%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
5.17%
6M
8.63%
1Y
61.08%
3Y*
-2.97%
5Y*
-7.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RBLD vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RBLD vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLD
RBLD Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RBLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN
QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLD vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RBLDQCLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

1.63

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

2.23

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.97

-1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.84

12.27

-2.43

RBLD vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLD and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBLDQCLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.63

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

-0.19

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.37

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.15

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between RBLD and QCLN is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RBLD vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

RBLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than QCLN's 0.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RBLD
First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF
1.10%1.19%1.31%1.16%2.10%1.45%2.88%1.84%1.74%1.49%2.01%1.17%
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.21%0.25%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.24%0.72%

Drawdowns

RBLD vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLD drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLD and QCLN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLDQCLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.07%

-76.18%

+26.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-16.18%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.35%

-69.49%

+44.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.07%

-71.73%

+21.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-45.67%

+41.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-43.54%

+32.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

5.24%

-2.57%

Volatility

RBLD vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) is 5.40%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that RBLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RBLDQCLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

13.73%

-8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

27.33%

-17.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

37.76%

-20.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

37.87%

-21.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.74%

34.62%

-15.88%