RBIL vs. RINF
Compare and contrast key facts about F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF).
RBIL and RINF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RBIL is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2025. RINF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. Both RBIL and RINF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RBIL vs. RINF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBIL vs. RINF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 1.49% | 2.91% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | -0.49% | 2.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than RINF's -0.49% return.
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBIL vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RBIL vs. RINF — Risk / Return Rank
RBIL
RINF
RBIL vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBIL | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 0.39 | +3.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.46 | 0.59 | +4.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.07 | +0.83 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.45 | 0.40 | +7.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.50 | 0.75 | +31.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBIL | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 0.39 | +3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.89 | 0.07 | +3.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBIL and RINF is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RBIL vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison
RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than RINF's 3.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.43% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.81% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
RBIL vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and RINF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBIL | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -43.51% | +43.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.50% | -2.60% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -1.62% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -16.65% | +16.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 1.40% | -1.29% |
Volatility
RBIL vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) is 0.61%, while ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that RBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBIL | RINF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 1.23% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.69% | 2.72% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05% | 5.44% | -4.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.04% | 12.94% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.04% | 12.66% | -11.62% |