RBESX vs. TMCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) and RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX).
RBESX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011. TMCIX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Jun 1, 1994.
Performance
RBESX vs. TMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBESX vs. TMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBESX RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund | -0.96% | 14.64% | 6.90% | 15.63% | -14.57% | -3.45% | 7.02% | 15.39% | -5.05% | 12.78% |
TMCIX RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund | -5.33% | -0.79% | 6.78% | 17.32% | -16.59% | 23.50% | 20.52% | 33.98% | -4.58% | 17.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBESX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly higher than TMCIX's -5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RBESX has underperformed TMCIX with an annualized return of 4.54%, while TMCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.04% annualized return.
RBESX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 11.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.14%
- 10Y*
- 4.54%
TMCIX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -5.33%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBESX vs. TMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBESX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than TMCIX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RBESX vs. TMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
RBESX
TMCIX
RBESX vs. TMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) and RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBESX | TMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 0.21 | +2.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 0.47 | +2.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.06 | +0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 0.18 | +2.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.14 | 0.60 | +10.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBESX | TMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 0.21 | +2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.11 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.44 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBESX and TMCIX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RBESX vs. TMCIX - Dividend Comparison
RBESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than TMCIX's 8.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBESX RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund | 4.80% | 5.58% | 6.59% | 6.60% | 7.85% | 3.37% | 3.58% | 5.94% | 3.78% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMCIX RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund | 8.22% | 7.78% | 1.32% | 2.04% | 7.82% | 24.68% | 2.63% | 7.32% | 9.26% | 22.57% | 7.25% | 11.05% |
Drawdowns
RBESX vs. TMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBESX drawdown since its inception was -51.19%, smaller than the maximum TMCIX drawdown of -57.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBESX and TMCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBESX | TMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.19% | -57.70% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.18% | -13.76% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.82% | -25.64% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.19% | -37.34% | -13.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.51% | -12.03% | -9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -16.62% | -8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 4.17% | -3.16% |
Volatility
RBESX vs. TMCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC BlueBay Emerging Market Debt Fund (RBESX) is 1.72%, while RBC SMID Cap Growth Fund (TMCIX) has a volatility of 5.81%. This indicates that RBESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBESX | TMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 5.81% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.87% | 12.17% | -9.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79% | 21.30% | -16.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 20.15% | -13.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.88% | 20.73% | +16.15% |