RBCGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
RBCGX is managed by Reynolds. It was launched on Aug 12, 1988. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
RBCGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBCGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund | -9.03% | 14.42% | 33.73% | 28.83% | -30.06% | -3.63% | 43.98% | 25.52% | -3.81% | -0.85% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBCGX achieves a -9.03% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
RBCGX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.03%
- 6M
- -11.29%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBCGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBCGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RBCGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
RBCGX
SWLGX
RBCGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBCGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.66 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.10 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.72 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 2.51 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBCGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.66 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.56 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.68 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBCGX and SWLGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RBCGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
RBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.34%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund | 18.34% | 16.69% | 7.84% | 0.00% | 6.27% | 7.33% | 9.93% | 4.67% | 21.03% | 8.16% | 9.06% | 6.53% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RBCGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBCGX drawdown since its inception was -77.12%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBCGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.12% | -32.69% | -44.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -16.16% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.47% | -32.69% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.55% | -16.16% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -7.13% | -17.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 4.62% | +0.38% |
Volatility
RBCGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) is 3.40%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that RBCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBCGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 5.38% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 11.82% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 22.31% | -6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 21.47% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 22.78% | -2.29% |