RBCGX vs. TILIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX).
RBCGX is managed by Reynolds. It was launched on Aug 12, 1988. TILIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
RBCGX vs. TILIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBCGX vs. TILIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund | -9.03% | 14.42% | 33.73% | 28.83% | -30.06% | -3.63% | 43.98% | 25.52% | -3.81% | 24.73% |
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.04% | 18.41% | 33.31% | 42.64% | -29.22% | 27.63% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.66% | 28.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBCGX achieves a -9.03% return, which is significantly higher than TILIX's -13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, RBCGX has underperformed TILIX with an annualized return of 10.16%, while TILIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.
RBCGX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.03%
- 6M
- -11.29%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
TILIX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -13.04%
- 6M
- -12.14%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 16.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBCGX vs. TILIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBCGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TILIX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RBCGX vs. TILIX — Risk / Return Rank
RBCGX
TILIX
RBCGX vs. TILIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBCGX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.65 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.10 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.67 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 2.32 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBCGX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.65 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.56 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.77 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBCGX and TILIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RBCGX vs. TILIX - Dividend Comparison
RBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.34%, more than TILIX's 5.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund | 18.34% | 16.69% | 7.84% | 0.00% | 6.27% | 7.33% | 9.93% | 4.67% | 21.03% | 8.16% | 9.06% | 6.53% |
TILIX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 5.07% | 4.41% | 3.25% | 1.90% | 11.00% | 8.76% | 1.91% | 2.38% | 4.01% | 0.68% | 1.33% | 1.32% |
Drawdowns
RBCGX vs. TILIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBCGX drawdown since its inception was -77.12%, which is greater than TILIX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCGX and TILIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBCGX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.12% | -50.54% | -26.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -16.24% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.47% | -32.68% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.47% | -32.68% | -12.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.55% | -16.24% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -7.77% | -16.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 4.73% | +0.27% |
Volatility
RBCGX vs. TILIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) is 3.40%, while TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (TILIX) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that RBCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBCGX | TILIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 5.34% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 11.80% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 22.35% | -6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 21.44% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 21.01% | -0.52% |