RBCGX vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RBCGX (Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - RBCGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Reynolds, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, RBCGX returned 12.12%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBCGX charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

RBCGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBCGX achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RBCGX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.12%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.

RBCGX

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 2.91%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 12.48%
• 3Y*: 20.42%
• 5Y*: 4.82%
• 10Y*: 12.12%

VOO

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBCGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund	2.91%	14.42%	33.73%	28.83%	-30.06%	-3.63%	43.98%	25.52%	-3.81%	24.73%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.19%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RBCGX and VOO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.90

The correlation between RBCGX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RBCGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBCGX

RBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
RBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
RBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 59
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBCGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBCGX	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.91	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	2.60	-1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.35	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	2.67	-1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	11.96	-9.52

RBCGX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBCGX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RBCGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBCGX drawdown since its inception was -77.12%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBCGX and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBCGX	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.12%	-33.99%	-43.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	-8.90%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.27%	-18.69%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.47%	-24.52%	-20.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.47%	-33.99%	-11.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.21%	-3.14%	-2.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.36%	-3.68%	-20.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	1.99%	+3.57%

Volatility

RBCGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund (RBCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that RBCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBCGX	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	4.83%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.49%	9.82%	+0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.95%	12.46%	+2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.04%	16.91%	+3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.63%	18.02%	+2.61%

RBCGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBCGX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBCGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.21%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RBCGX Reynolds Blue Chip Growth Fund	16.21%	16.69%	7.84%	0.00%	6.27%	7.33%	9.93%	4.67%	21.03%	8.16%	9.06%	6.53%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBCGX and VOO in my portfolio?

RBCGX and VOO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBCGX or VOO?

RBCGX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBCGX dropped -77.12% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.