RB vs. QB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from ProShares - RB tracks the Russell 2000 while QB tracks the Nasdaq-100. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RB returned 18.24% vs 18.61% for QB. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.58% expense ratio.

Performance

RB vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RB achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than QB's 12.42% return.

RB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: 5.39%
• YTD: 7.90%
• 1Y: 18.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.44%
• 6M: 11.41%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 1Y: 18.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RB vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	7.90%	10.85%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	12.42%	6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RB and QB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.53

The correlation between RB and QB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RB vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RB

RB Risk / Return Rank: 96
RB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RB Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
RB Omega Ratio Rank: 95
RB Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

QB

QB Risk / Return Rank: 94
QB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
QB Omega Ratio Rank: 95
QB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RB vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RB	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.66	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.74	3.87	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.63	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.77	5.38	+3.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.21	25.93	+2.27

RB vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RB Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the QB Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RB and QB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RB vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -2.09%, smaller than the maximum QB drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RB	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-3.47%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.09%	-3.47%	+1.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-0.22%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.44%	-0.42%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.65%	0.72%	-0.07%

Volatility

RB vs. QB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) is 1.54%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that RB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RB	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	2.71%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.74%	5.83%	-1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.57%	7.03%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.46%	6.91%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.46%	6.91%	-0.45%

RB vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RB and QB have an expense ratio of 0.58%.

Dividends

RB vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than QB's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.77%	0.48%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	2.27%	1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RB and QB in my portfolio?

RB and QB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RB or QB?

QB has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to RB (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RB dropped -2.09% vs QB's -3.47%.

Which ETF is better, RB or QB?

On 1-year performance, QB leads with 18.61% vs 18.24% for RB. Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. On volatility, RB has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RB or QB?

Over the 1-year period, QB has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RB or QB?

RB and QB have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RB or QB?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.77% for QB.

What is the main difference between RB and QB?

RB tracks Russell 2000, while QB tracks Nasdaq-100.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.