RAYS vs. VFH
RAYS (Global X Solar ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAYS is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Solar Index, while VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. RAYS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
RAYS vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RAYS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
RAYS vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 0.61% |
RAYS vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RAYS
VFH
Technology
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
RAYS
VFH
Industrials
RAYS
VFH
Utilities
RAYS
VFH
-
Consumer Cyclical
RAYS
VFH
Basic Materials
RAYS
VFH
-
Communication Services
RAYS
-
VFH
Consumer Defensive
RAYS
-
VFH
-
Energy
RAYS
-
VFH
-
Financial Services
RAYS
-
VFH
Healthcare
RAYS
-
VFH
Real Estate
RAYS
-
VFH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAYS vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
RAYS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFH
RAYS vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Solar ETF (RAYS) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RAYS | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAYS vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAYS drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYS and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAYS | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -78.61% | +78.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.57% | +4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -18.52% | +18.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility
RAYS vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAYS | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 15.06% | -15.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 19.34% | -19.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 22.55% | -22.55% |
RAYS vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAYS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAYS vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
RAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAYS Global X Solar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, VFH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYS.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.00% for RAYS.
RAYS is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VFH is Financials Equities. RAYS tracks Solactive Solar Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RAYS and 0.09% for VFH.
Find the right allocation for RAYS and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer