RAFE vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RAFE (PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. RAFE is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAFE returned 10.92%/yr vs 8.51%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RAFE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

RAFE vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.24% return.

RAFE

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 6.78%
• YTD: 13.86%
• 6M: 15.30%
• 1Y: 33.02%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 10.92%
• 10Y*: —

PSCX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 5.24%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 16.09%
• 3Y*: 12.89%
• 5Y*: 8.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAFE vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF	13.86%	17.60%	13.81%	18.80%	-13.76%	30.16%	1.34%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.24%	12.08%	13.27%	16.57%	-7.35%	9.03%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RAFE and PSCX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020	0.81

The correlation between RAFE and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

RAFE vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RAFE	PSCX
Technology	29.8%	33.2%
Healthcare	23.1%	9.6%
Financial Services	13.3%	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	5.4%
Communication Services	7.2%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.5%	10.0%
Industrials	5.0%	8.4%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.9%
Real Estate	2.7%	2.0%
Utilities	0.6%	2.6%
Energy	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

RAFE vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAFE

RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 85
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 87
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAFE vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RAFE	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.93	2.92	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	4.38	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.60	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.42	3.95	+0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.30	20.26	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RAFE vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAFE and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RAFE	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.93	2.92	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	1.21	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	1.28	-0.63

Drawdowns

RAFE vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAFE	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.74%	-10.20%	-25.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.46%	-4.20%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.36%	-9.61%	-6.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.28%	-10.20%	-14.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-1.87%	-4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	0.82%	+1.09%

Volatility

RAFE vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.92%. This indicates that RAFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RAFE	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	0.92%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	4.21%	+4.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.33%	5.54%	+5.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	7.07%	+8.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.44%	6.97%	+12.47%

RAFE vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAFE vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF	1.49%	1.67%	1.79%	1.81%	2.22%	1.42%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAFE and PSCX in my portfolio?

RAFE and PSCX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RAFE or PSCX?

RAFE has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to PSCX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAFE dropped -35.74% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, RAFE or PSCX?

On 5-year performance, RAFE leads with 10.92% vs 8.51% for PSCX. On fees, RAFE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RAFE or PSCX?

Over the 5-year period, RAFE has performed better with a 10.92% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAFE or PSCX?

RAFE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAFE or PSCX?

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between RAFE and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.75% for PSCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.