RAFE vs. PSCX
RAFE (PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the RAFI ESG US Index, while PSCX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. RAFE is passively managed, while PSCX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAFE returned 11.54%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RAFE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.
Performance
RAFE vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.97% return.
RAFE
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- YTD
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.67%
PSCX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 13.16%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.18K | $20.77K | $40.17K | |
| $564.44K | $467.39K | $607.84K |
RAFE vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF | 16.68% | 17.60% | 13.81% | 18.80% | -13.76% | 30.16% | 2.41% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 5.97% | 12.08% | 13.27% | 16.57% | -7.35% | 9.03% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAFE and PSCX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between RAFE and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAFE vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
RAFE
PSCX
RAFE vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RAFE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.42 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 2.92 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.26 | 14.53 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RAFE vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and PSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAFE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -10.20% | -25.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.46% | -4.20% | -3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.36% | -9.61% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.28% | -10.20% | -14.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | 0.00% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -1.82% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 0.85% | +1.02% |
Volatility
RAFE vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 1.55%. This indicates that RAFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAFE | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 1.55% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.70% | 4.63% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 5.75% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 7.14% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 6.94% | +12.33% |
RAFE vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAFE vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF | 1.48% | 1.67% | 1.79% | 1.81% | 2.22% | 1.42% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAFE and PSCX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RAFE has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to PSCX (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAFE dropped -35.74% vs PSCX's -10.20%.
On 5-year performance, RAFE leads with 11.54% vs 8.41% for PSCX. On fees, RAFE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RAFE has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RAFE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.
RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.
RAFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSCX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.75% for PSCX.
RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RAFE and PSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer