PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAFE vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAFE vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


RAFE

1D
0.94%
1M
6.78%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.30%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAFE vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
13.86%17.60%13.81%18.80%-13.76%30.16%5.29%0.55%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RAFE and MTUM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019

0.70

The correlation between RAFE and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RAFE vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RAFE
MTUM

Technology

29.8%
44.4%

Healthcare

23.1%
6.9%

Financial Services

13.3%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
3.3%

Communication Services

7.2%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
3.6%

Industrials

5.0%
15.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Utilities

0.6%
1.6%

Energy

-

3.5%

Technology

RAFE
29.8%
MTUM
44.4%

Healthcare

RAFE
23.1%
MTUM
6.9%

Financial Services

RAFE
13.3%
MTUM
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

RAFE
7.7%
MTUM
3.3%

Communication Services

RAFE
7.2%
MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RAFE
6.5%
MTUM
3.6%

Industrials

RAFE
5.0%
MTUM
15.6%

Basic Materials

RAFE
4.2%
MTUM
1.7%

Real Estate

RAFE
2.7%
MTUM
1.8%

Utilities

RAFE
0.6%
MTUM
1.6%

Energy

RAFE

-

MTUM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAFE vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAFE
RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAFE vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAFEMTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.93

2.20

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.06

2.98

+1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.39

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

3.64

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.30

14.50

+2.80

RAFE vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAFE and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAFEMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

2.20

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.74

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.85

-0.20

Drawdowns

RAFE vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAFEMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-34.08%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-11.54%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-20.99%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-32.28%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-6.21%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.89%

-0.98%

Volatility

RAFE vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) is 3.01%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that RAFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAFEMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

7.68%

-4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

16.46%

-8.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

19.04%

-7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

20.60%

-5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

21.03%

-1.59%

RAFE vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAFE vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
1.49%1.67%1.79%1.81%2.22%1.42%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAFE and MTUM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to RAFE (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAFE dropped -35.74% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.21% vs 10.92% for RAFE. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RAFE has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAFE.

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

RAFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.15% for MTUM.

RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAFE and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer