RAFE vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RAFE (PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAFE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the RAFI ESG US Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RAFE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

RAFE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.

RAFE

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 12.91%
• 1Y: 29.87%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAFE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF	13.45%	13.04%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.30%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RAFE and BUFH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

RAFE vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAFE

RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 84
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

BUFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAFE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RAFE	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.57	—	—

Drawdowns

RAFE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAFE	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.74%	-1.53%	-34.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-0.26%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-0.18%	-5.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RAFE	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	2.38%	+9.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.10%	2.38%	+12.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.40%	2.38%	+17.02%

RAFE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAFE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RAFE PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF	1.50%	1.67%	1.79%	1.81%	2.22%	1.42%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAFE and BUFH in my portfolio?

RAFE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RAFE or BUFH?

On fees, RAFE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAFE or BUFH?

RAFE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAFE or BUFH?

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between RAFE and BUFH?

RAFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.95% for BUFH.