RACK vs. GDX
RACK (VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RACK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RACK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
RACK vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RACK
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDX
- 1D
- -3.95%
- 1M
- -12.27%
- YTD
- -13.03%
- 6M
- -16.85%
- 1Y
- 44.87%
- 3Y*
- 37.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
RACK vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | -2.60% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -13.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between RACK and GDX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RACK vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
RACK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDX
RACK vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RACK | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RACK vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RACK drawdown since its inception was -12.62%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RACK and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RACK | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.62% | -80.34% | +67.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -35.61% | +29.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -40.40% | +35.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.95% | — |
Volatility
RACK vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RACK | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.99% | 47.80% | +9.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.99% | 36.93% | +20.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.99% | 37.39% | +19.60% |
RACK vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RACK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
RACK vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
RACK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.85% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
RACK VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RACK and GDX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RACK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RACK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for RACK.
RACK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GDX is Gold. RACK tracks MarketVector Data Center Supply Chain Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RACK and 0.51% for GDX.
Find the right allocation for RACK and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer