R2SC.L vs. DGRW
R2SC.L (SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - R2SC.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L returned 11.57%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for DGRW. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. R2SC.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
R2SC.L is traded in GBP, while DGRW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRW values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R2SC.L achieves a 19.34% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 11.57%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.
R2SC.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 19.34%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
DGRW
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 20.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2SC.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 19.34% | 4.66% | 11.88% | 12.16% | -11.55% | 15.87% | 15.73% | 20.67% | -7.45% | 4.45% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 8.43% | 4.18% | 19.03% | 12.73% | 4.80% | 25.64% | 10.52% | 24.61% | 0.23% | 15.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between R2SC.L and DGRW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014 | 0.47 |
R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
R2SC.L
DGRW
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Technology
R2SC.L
DGRW
Industrials
R2SC.L
DGRW
Healthcare
R2SC.L
DGRW
Financial Services
R2SC.L
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
R2SC.L
DGRW
Real Estate
R2SC.L
DGRW
-
Energy
R2SC.L
DGRW
Basic Materials
R2SC.L
DGRW
Utilities
R2SC.L
DGRW
Communication Services
R2SC.L
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
R2SC.L
DGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R2SC.L vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
R2SC.L
DGRW
R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| R2SC.L | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.80 | 2.98 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.21 | 11.89 | +2.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R2SC.L drawdown since its inception was -44.96%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -23.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R2SC.L and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R2SC.L | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.96% | -23.81% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | -6.62% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.00% | -18.72% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.00% | -18.72% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.03% | -23.81% | -11.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.68% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | -2.97% | -10.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 1.66% | +1.26% |
Volatility
R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.29%. This indicates that R2SC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R2SC.L | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 3.29% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | 7.67% | +4.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 9.93% | +7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 13.47% | +12.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.88% | 16.68% | +7.20% |
R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
R2SC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
R2SC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
R2SC.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
R2SC.L and DGRW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for R2SC.L.
R2SC.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. R2SC.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for R2SC.L and 0.28% for DGRW.
Find the right allocation for R2SC.L and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer