PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
R2SC.L vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

R2SC.L is traded in GBP, while DGRW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRW values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, R2SC.L achieves a 19.34% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 11.57%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.


R2SC.L

1D
2.39%
1M
3.94%
YTD
19.34%
6M
15.53%
1Y
42.90%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
11.57%

DGRW

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
8.43%
6M
7.65%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
14.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
R2SC.L
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF
19.34%4.66%11.88%12.16%-11.55%15.87%15.73%20.67%-7.45%4.45%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.43%4.18%19.03%12.73%4.80%25.64%10.52%24.61%0.23%15.92%

Correlation

The correlation between R2SC.L and DGRW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014

0.47

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
R2SC.L
DGRW

Technology

19.2%
32.1%

Industrials

17.9%
9.9%

Healthcare

16.3%
12.8%

Financial Services

15.5%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
7.1%

Real Estate

5.9%

-

Energy

5.3%
5.0%

Basic Materials

4.7%
3.3%

Utilities

2.7%
0.2%

Communication Services

2.5%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
6.7%

Technology

R2SC.L
19.2%
DGRW
32.1%

Industrials

R2SC.L
17.9%
DGRW
9.9%

Healthcare

R2SC.L
16.3%
DGRW
12.8%

Financial Services

R2SC.L
15.5%
DGRW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

R2SC.L
7.9%
DGRW
7.1%

Real Estate

R2SC.L
5.9%
DGRW

-

Energy

R2SC.L
5.3%
DGRW
5.0%

Basic Materials

R2SC.L
4.7%
DGRW
3.3%

Utilities

R2SC.L
2.7%
DGRW
0.2%

Communication Services

R2SC.L
2.5%
DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

R2SC.L
2.2%
DGRW
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

R2SC.L vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R2SC.L
R2SC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


R2SC.LDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

2.98

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.21

11.89

+2.32

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R2SC.L and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R2SC.L drawdown since its inception was -44.96%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -23.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R2SC.L and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


R2SC.LDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.96%

-23.81%

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-6.62%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.00%

-18.72%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.00%

-18.72%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.03%

-23.81%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.68%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.87%

-2.97%

-10.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

1.66%

+1.26%

Volatility

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.29%. This indicates that R2SC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


R2SC.LDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

3.29%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

7.67%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

9.93%

+7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.09%

13.47%

+12.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.88%

16.68%

+7.20%

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

R2SC.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

R2SC.L vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

R2SC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
R2SC.L
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


R2SC.L and DGRW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for R2SC.L.

R2SC.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. R2SC.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for R2SC.L and 0.28% for DGRW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for R2SC.L and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer