PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
R2SC.L vs. ^SP400
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and S&P 400 Index (^SP400). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

R2SC.L is traded in GBP, while ^SP400 is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^SP400 values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, R2SC.L achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than ^SP400's 13.91% return. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L has outperformed ^SP400 with an annualized return of 11.53%, while ^SP400 has yielded a comparatively lower 10.45% annualized return.


R2SC.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.94%
YTD
16.67%
6M
16.08%
1Y
40.29%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
11.53%

^SP400

1D
0.17%
1M
4.58%
YTD
13.91%
6M
12.96%
1Y
24.61%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
R2SC.L
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF
16.67%4.66%11.86%12.18%-11.55%15.87%15.73%20.67%-7.45%4.45%
^SP400
S&P 400 Index
13.91%-1.64%14.16%8.73%-4.32%24.38%8.52%19.33%-7.31%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between R2SC.L and ^SP400 is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.61

The correlation between R2SC.L and ^SP400 has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R2SC.L
R2SC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
R2SC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP400
^SP400 Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
^SP400 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP400 Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP400 Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP400 Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP400 Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and S&P 400 Index (^SP400). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


R2SC.L^SP400Difference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

3.04

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

10.92

+2.76

R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the ^SP400 Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R2SC.L and ^SP400, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


R2SC.L^SP400Difference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.68

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.42

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.51

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.47

+0.08

Drawdowns

R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R2SC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum ^SP400 drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R2SC.L and ^SP400.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


R2SC.L^SP400Difference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-38.17%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-8.14%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.00%

-25.72%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.00%

-25.72%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.03%

-35.41%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

0.00%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-6.76%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.26%

+0.68%

Volatility

R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to S&P 400 Index (^SP400) at 3.87%. This indicates that R2SC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP400 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


R2SC.L^SP400Difference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

3.87%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

10.63%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.24%

14.77%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

18.39%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.78%

20.64%

+0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


R2SC.L and ^SP400 have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for R2SC.L and ^SP400

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer