R2SC.L vs. ^SP400
R2SC.L (SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while ^SP400 (S&P 400 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L returned 11.53%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for ^SP400. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
R2SC.L is traded in GBP, while ^SP400 is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^SP400 values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R2SC.L achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than ^SP400's 13.91% return. Over the past 10 years, R2SC.L has outperformed ^SP400 with an annualized return of 11.53%, while ^SP400 has yielded a comparatively lower 10.45% annualized return.
R2SC.L
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 40.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
^SP400
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2SC.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 16.67% | 4.66% | 11.86% | 12.18% | -11.55% | 15.87% | 15.73% | 20.67% | -7.45% | 4.45% |
^SP400 S&P 400 Index | 13.91% | -1.64% | 14.16% | 8.73% | -4.32% | 24.38% | 8.52% | 19.33% | -7.31% | 4.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between R2SC.L and ^SP400 is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014 | 0.61 |
The correlation between R2SC.L and ^SP400 has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 — Risk / Return Rank
R2SC.L
^SP400
R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) and S&P 400 Index (^SP400). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| R2SC.L | ^SP400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.30 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 3.04 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.68 | 10.92 | +2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| R2SC.L | ^SP400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.68 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.42 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.51 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.47 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R2SC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum ^SP400 drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R2SC.L and ^SP400.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R2SC.L | ^SP400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.03% | -38.17% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | -8.14% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.00% | -25.72% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.00% | -25.72% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.03% | -35.41% | +0.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | 0.00% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.52% | -6.76% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 2.26% | +0.68% |
Volatility
R2SC.L vs. ^SP400 - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to S&P 400 Index (^SP400) at 3.87%. This indicates that R2SC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP400 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R2SC.L | ^SP400 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 3.87% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 10.63% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 14.77% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 18.39% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 20.64% | +0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
R2SC.L and ^SP400 have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for R2SC.L and ^SP400
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer