R1GR.AS vs. SCHG

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

R1GR.AS (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - R1GR.AS tracks the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, R1GR.AS returned 20.36%/yr vs 21.11%/yr for SCHG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. R1GR.AS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, R1GR.AS achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 5.02% return.

R1GR.AS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: 3.65%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 1Y: 12.60%
• 3Y*: 20.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 2.26%
• 6M: 5.86%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 21.11%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: 18.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	2.47%	17.57%	35.07%	11.97%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	5.02%	17.50%	34.95%	13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between R1GR.AS and SCHG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023	0.62

The correlation between R1GR.AS and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R1GR.AS

R1GR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 24
R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
R1GR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
R1GR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
R1GR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
R1GR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 29
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	R1GR.AS	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	0.95	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.36	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.17	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	0.95	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.42	3.03	-0.61

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current R1GR.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R1GR.AS and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R1GR.AS drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1GR.AS and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	R1GR.AS	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.09%	-34.59%	+11.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.71%	-16.41%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.09%	-23.39%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.22%	-3.07%	-2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-5.19%	+1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.18%	5.12%	+0.06%

Volatility

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.74%. This indicates that R1GR.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	R1GR.AS	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	4.74%	+1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.81%	12.82%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	16.40%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	22.41%	-4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.88%	21.57%	-3.69%

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

R1GR.AS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

R1GR.AS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

R1GR.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both R1GR.AS and SCHG in my portfolio?

R1GR.AS and SCHG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, R1GR.AS or SCHG?

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, R1GR.AS or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for R1GR.AS.

What is the main difference between R1GR.AS and SCHG?

R1GR.AS tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for R1GR.AS and 0.04% for SCHG.