R1GR.AS vs. QGRW
R1GR.AS (iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - R1GR.AS tracks the Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index while QGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, R1GR.AS returned 16.71% vs 24.69% for QGRW. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. R1GR.AS charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.
Performance
R1GR.AS vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R1GR.AS achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 9.00% return.
R1GR.AS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRW
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
R1GR.AS vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF | 1.63% | 17.57% | 35.07% | 11.97% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 9.00% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between R1GR.AS and QGRW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.61 |
The correlation between R1GR.AS and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
R1GR.AS vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
R1GR.AS
QGRW
R1GR.AS vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| R1GR.AS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.61 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 5.97 | -2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
R1GR.AS vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R1GR.AS drawdown since its inception was -23.09%, smaller than the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R1GR.AS and QGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| R1GR.AS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.09% | -24.40% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -15.44% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -6.82% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -3.29% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 4.14% | +0.86% |
Volatility
R1GR.AS vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (R1GR.AS) is 5.11%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that R1GR.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| R1GR.AS | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 7.92% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 15.10% | -3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 18.64% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 21.27% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.80% | 21.27% | -3.47% |
R1GR.AS vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
R1GR.AS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
R1GR.AS vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
R1GR.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% |
R1GR.AS iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
R1GR.AS and QGRW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, R1GR.AS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
R1GR.AS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.
R1GR.AS tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for R1GR.AS and 0.28% for QGRW.
Find the right allocation for R1GR.AS and QGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer