PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. VHYD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than VHYD.L's 9.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QYLD having a 9.69% annualized return and VHYD.L not far ahead at 9.89%.


QYLD

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
6.22%
6M
8.09%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
9.69%

VHYD.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.39%
YTD
9.52%
6M
12.15%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
6.22%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
9.52%27.03%9.32%11.43%-5.45%17.84%-0.31%20.75%-11.71%19.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and VHYD.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.37

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QYLD
VHYD.L

Technology

53.8%
7.7%

Communication Services

15.8%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
8.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
11.2%

Industrials

2.8%
12.3%

Utilities

1.4%
5.7%

Basic Materials

1.1%
5.1%

Energy

0.6%
9.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
28.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.9%

Technology

QYLD
53.8%
VHYD.L
7.7%

Communication Services

QYLD
15.8%
VHYD.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QYLD
12.3%
VHYD.L
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

QYLD
7.7%
VHYD.L
8.7%

Healthcare

QYLD
4.2%
VHYD.L
11.2%

Industrials

QYLD
2.8%
VHYD.L
12.3%

Utilities

QYLD
1.4%
VHYD.L
5.7%

Basic Materials

QYLD
1.1%
VHYD.L
5.1%

Energy

QYLD
0.6%
VHYD.L
9.4%

Financial Services

QYLD
0.2%
VHYD.L
28.6%

Real Estate

QYLD
0.1%
VHYD.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. VHYD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYD.L
VHYD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLDVHYD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.42

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

3.16

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.77

11.40

+13.37

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the VHYD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and VHYD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLDVHYD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.30

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.64

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.54

+0.04

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum VHYD.L drawdown of -36.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and VHYD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDVHYD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-36.60%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-7.74%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-12.48%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-20.89%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

-36.60%

+11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-1.62%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-5.32%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

2.15%

-1.29%

Volatility

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYD.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that QYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLDVHYD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.67%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

8.53%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.86%

10.62%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

13.65%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.39%

+0.12%

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VHYD.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLD vs. VHYD.L - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.64%, more than VHYD.L's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.64%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
VHYD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.52%2.77%3.15%3.31%3.72%3.14%2.90%3.23%3.77%2.96%3.16%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD and VHYD.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHYD.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHYD.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VHYD.L is Global Equities. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while VHYD.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.29% for VHYD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and VHYD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer