QYLD vs. UPRO
QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while UPRO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QYLD returned 9.76%/yr vs 29.76%/yr for UPRO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.
Performance
QYLD vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 20.70% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of 9.76%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.76% annualized return.
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 7.64%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
UPRO
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 20.70%
- 6M
- 21.09%
- 1Y
- 70.79%
- 3Y*
- 46.83%
- 5Y*
- 21.40%
- 10Y*
- 29.76%
QYLD vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.64% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 18.79% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 20.70% | 31.88% | 63.57% | 68.53% | -56.84% | 98.64% | 10.09% | 102.30% | -25.11% | 71.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QYLD and UPRO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QYLD and UPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
QYLD vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QYLD
UPRO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QYLD
UPRO
Communication Services
QYLD
UPRO
Consumer Cyclical
QYLD
UPRO
Consumer Defensive
QYLD
UPRO
Healthcare
QYLD
UPRO
Industrials
QYLD
UPRO
Utilities
QYLD
UPRO
Basic Materials
QYLD
UPRO
Energy
QYLD
UPRO
Financial Services
QYLD
UPRO
Real Estate
QYLD
UPRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QYLD vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank
QYLD
UPRO
QYLD vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QYLD | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.30 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 2.43 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.84 | 10.01 | +15.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QYLD vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and UPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QYLD | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -76.82% | +52.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.97% | -26.78% | +21.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -48.87% | +29.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.61% | -63.94% | +39.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | -76.82% | +52.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -7.60% | +7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -14.40% | +10.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 6.50% | -5.62% |
Volatility
QYLD vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 3.82%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 13.22%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QYLD | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 13.22% | -9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 28.74% | -20.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.16% | 36.77% | -27.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 50.52% | -35.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 53.83% | -38.31% |
QYLD vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
QYLD vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.48%, more than UPRO's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.48% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.72% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QYLD and UPRO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPRO has higher volatility (13.22%) compared to QYLD (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs UPRO's -76.82%.
On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 29.76% vs 9.76% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 29.76% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.48%, compared with 0.72% for UPRO.
QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while UPRO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.89% for UPRO.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QYLD and UPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer