PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QYLD vs. TECB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QYLD vs. TECB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than TECB's 14.97% return.


QYLD

1D
1.07%
1M
0.23%
YTD
7.05%
6M
8.87%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
9.77%

TECB

1D
0.52%
1M
1.69%
YTD
14.97%
6M
13.40%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
24.72%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. TECB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.05%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%7.69%
TECB
iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF
14.97%14.86%24.38%57.53%-34.39%19.60%39.90%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and TECB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2020

0.85

The correlation between QYLD and TECB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLD vs. TECB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QYLD
TECB

Technology

53.8%
64.2%

Communication Services

15.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%
10.7%

Industrials

2.8%
0.9%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.7%

Technology

QYLD
53.8%
TECB
64.2%

Communication Services

QYLD
15.8%
TECB
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QYLD
12.3%
TECB
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

QYLD
7.7%
TECB

-

Healthcare

QYLD
4.2%
TECB
10.7%

Industrials

QYLD
2.8%
TECB
0.9%

Utilities

QYLD
1.4%
TECB

-

Basic Materials

QYLD
1.1%
TECB

-

Energy

QYLD
0.6%
TECB
0.6%

Financial Services

QYLD
0.2%
TECB
5.6%

Real Estate

QYLD
0.1%
TECB
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QYLD vs. TECB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TECB
TECB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TECB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECB Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
TECB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. TECB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QYLDTECBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.27

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

1.69

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.31

4.93

+21.38

QYLD vs. TECB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the TECB Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and TECB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QYLDTECBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.56

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.57

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.70

-0.11

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. TECB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum TECB drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and TECB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QYLDTECBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-41.62%

+16.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-16.24%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-23.91%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-41.62%

+17.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-5.64%

+4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-10.17%

+6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

5.55%

-4.69%

Volatility

QYLD vs. TECB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 2.86%, while iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QYLDTECBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

7.20%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

14.03%

-6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.84%

17.68%

-8.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

23.59%

-8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

25.42%

-9.91%

QYLD vs. TECB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TECB's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

QYLD vs. TECB - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, more than TECB's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.55%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
TECB
iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF
0.29%0.33%0.35%0.23%0.61%0.35%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QYLD and TECB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECB has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to QYLD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs TECB's -41.62%.

On 5-year performance, TECB leads with 13.47% vs 8.24% for QYLD. On fees, TECB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TECB has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.55%, compared with 0.29% for TECB.

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TECB is Technology Equities. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while TECB tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.40% for TECB.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QYLD and TECB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer