TECB vs. AIQ
TECB (iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TECB tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index while AIQ tracks the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TECB returned 14.60%/yr vs 19.07%/yr for AIQ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TECB charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
TECB vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TECB achieves a 19.78% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.
TECB
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 12.64%
- YTD
- 19.78%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 35.98%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 69.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
TECB vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECB iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 19.78% | 14.86% | 24.38% | 57.53% | -34.39% | 19.60% | 39.90% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 35.98% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 47.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TECB and AIQ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TECB and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
TECB vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TECB
AIQ
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TECB
AIQ
Healthcare
TECB
AIQ
Communication Services
TECB
AIQ
Financial Services
TECB
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
TECB
AIQ
Real Estate
TECB
AIQ
-
Industrials
TECB
AIQ
Energy
TECB
AIQ
-
Basic Materials
TECB
-
AIQ
-
Consumer Defensive
TECB
-
AIQ
-
Utilities
TECB
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TECB vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
TECB
AIQ
TECB vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TECB | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 3.02 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 3.70 | -0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.49 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 4.22 | -2.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.24 | 14.59 | -8.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TECB | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 3.02 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.76 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.84 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
TECB vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TECB drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TECB and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TECB | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.62% | -44.66% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.24% | -16.47% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.91% | -26.35% | +2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -44.66% | +3.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -1.40% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -9.80% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 4.76% | +0.77% |
Volatility
TECB vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF (TECB) is 5.28%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that TECB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TECB | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 8.60% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | 18.46% | -5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.05% | 23.04% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 25.33% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 25.50% | -0.13% |
TECB vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TECB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TECB vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
TECB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
TECB iShares U.S. Tech Breakthrough Multisector ETF | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.35% | 0.23% | 0.61% | 0.35% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TECB and AIQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to TECB (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TECB dropped -41.62% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 19.07% vs 14.60% for TECB. On fees, TECB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TECB has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 14.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TECB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
TECB has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
TECB tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Tech Breakthrough Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TECB and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TECB and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer