QYLD vs. TDIV

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QYLD returned 9.92%/yr vs 18.79%/yr for TDIV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.

Performance

QYLD vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 23.55% return. Over the past 10 years, QYLD has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 9.92%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.79% annualized return.

QYLD

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 8.36%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

TDIV

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 6.70%
• YTD: 23.55%
• 6M: 23.56%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 28.46%
• 5Y*: 18.13%
• 10Y*: 18.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QYLD vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	8.36%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	10.41%	8.72%	22.69%	-3.07%	18.79%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	23.55%	25.27%	24.43%	36.71%	-22.13%	29.49%	17.55%	33.27%	-3.18%	21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and TDIV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013	0.75

The correlation between QYLD and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLD vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QYLD	TDIV
Technology	58.7%	87.1%
Communication Services	14.3%	11.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	-
Industrials	2.6%	1.3%
Utilities	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QYLD vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 91
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

TDIV

TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 69
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QYLD vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QYLD	TDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.07	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	2.71	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.36	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.81	3.60	+1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.11	10.83	+16.28

QYLD vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum TDIV drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and TDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLD	TDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-31.97%	+7.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.97%	-11.35%	+6.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	-23.00%	+3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.61%	-31.97%	+7.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	-31.97%	+7.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-7.08%	+7.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-4.85%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	3.77%	-2.89%

Volatility

QYLD vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 3.87%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLD	TDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	10.01%	-6.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	15.70%	-7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.19%	19.77%	-10.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	20.92%	-6.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.53%	20.98%	-5.45%

QYLD vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLD vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.41%, more than TDIV's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.41%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	1.18%	1.40%	1.59%	1.74%	2.51%	1.76%	2.07%	2.27%	2.97%	2.27%	2.45%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLD and TDIV in my portfolio?

QYLD and TDIV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QYLD or TDIV?

TDIV has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to QYLD (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

Which ETF is better, QYLD or TDIV?

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.79% vs 9.92% for QYLD. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QYLD or TDIV?

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.79% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLD or TDIV?

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QYLD or TDIV?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.41%, compared with 1.18% for TDIV.

What is the main difference between QYLD and TDIV?

QYLD is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TDIV is Technology Equities. QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.50% for TDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.