QYLD vs. QTOP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QYLD tracks the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2 while QTOP tracks the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QYLD returned 21.85% vs 28.78% for QTOP. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QTOP.

Performance

QYLD vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QYLD achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than QTOP's 14.73% return.

QYLD

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 6.38%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 1Y: 21.85%
• 3Y*: 13.13%
• 5Y*: 7.94%
• 10Y*: 9.65%
• ALL TIME*: 8.64%

QTOP

• 1D: 2.18%
• 1M: -1.61%
• 6M: 12.36%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 1Y: 28.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	$6.54M	$5.91M	$7.12M
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	$81.92M	$78.72M	$98.91M

QYLD vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	8.73%	9.28%	4.01%
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	14.73%	22.19%	6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between QYLD and QTOP is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024	0.88

The correlation between QYLD and QTOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QYLD vs. QTOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QYLD	QTOP
Technology	61.4%	67.0%
Communication Services	12.5%	15.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	9.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	7.2%
Industrials	4.4%	0.9%
Healthcare	3.8%	2.9%
Utilities	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.5%
Energy	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QYLD vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 87
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QTOP

QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 56
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QYLD vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QYLD	QTOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.35	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	1.89	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.24	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	2.22	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.57	6.87	+10.70

QYLD vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLD and QTOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QYLD vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QYLD drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLD and QTOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	QYLD	QTOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	-23.28%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.78%	-13.02%	+7.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-6.70%	+4.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-3.93%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	4.20%	-2.95%

Volatility

QYLD vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is 5.17%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 8.45%. This indicates that QYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QYLD	QTOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	8.45%	-3.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.07%	18.07%	-8.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.26%	21.41%	-10.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	23.81%	-8.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.64%	23.81%	-8.17%

QYLD vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

QYLD vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.78%, more than QTOP's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.78%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QYLD and QTOP in my portfolio?

QYLD and QTOP have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QYLD or QTOP?

QTOP has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to QYLD (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QYLD dropped -24.75% vs QTOP's -23.28%.

Which ETF is better, QYLD or QTOP?

On 1-year performance, QTOP leads with 28.78% vs 21.85% for QYLD. On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QYLD or QTOP?

Over the 1-year period, QTOP has performed better with a 28.78% return vs 21.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QYLD or QTOP?

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QYLD or QTOP?

QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.78%, compared with 0.34% for QTOP.

What is the main difference between QYLD and QTOP?

QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QYLD and 0.20% for QTOP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.