QTOP vs. MAGS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS).
QTOP and MAGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTOP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. It was launched on Oct 23, 2024. MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023.
Performance
QTOP vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QTOP vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | -6.23% | 22.19% | 5.80% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -12.16% | 22.99% | 13.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a -6.23% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -12.16% return.
QTOP
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- -6.23%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 26.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- 4.60%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -12.16%
- 6M
- -9.36%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QTOP vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QTOP vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
QTOP
MAGS
QTOP vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTOP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.99 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.61 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.49 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 5.25 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTOP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.99 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.34 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between QTOP and MAGS is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QTOP vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than MAGS's 1.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.42% | 0.38% | 0.11% | 0.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.68% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
Drawdowns
QTOP vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and MAGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -29.91% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -18.62% | +5.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.61% | -14.87% | +5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -4.75% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 5.29% | -1.55% |
Volatility
QTOP vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is 7.13%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that QTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QTOP | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 8.36% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 15.45% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.49% | 28.68% | -5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 26.29% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 26.29% | -3.17% |