PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVOY vs. IAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVOY vs. IAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVOY achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than IAK's 10.07% return.


QVOY

1D
-0.52%
1M
-1.91%
6M
4.51%
YTD
8.43%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.51%

IAK

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.06%
6M
12.67%
YTD
10.07%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
19.72%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
13.45%
ALL TIME*
7.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.76M$20.90M$11.89M
$188.32K$185.06K$225.54K

QVOY vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QVOY
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
8.43%16.45%1.55%17.19%-0.99%
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
10.07%9.50%28.25%11.28%-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QVOY and IAK is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022

0.25

The correlation between QVOY and IAK shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVOY vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QVOY
QVOY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QVOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVOY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QVOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IAK
IAK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QVOY vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVOYIAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.45

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

5.96

-0.80

QVOY vs. IAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVOY Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the IAK Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVOY and IAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVOY vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVOY drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVOY and IAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVOYIAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-77.38%

+60.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-7.62%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.05%

-11.58%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.37%

-3.23%

-5.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-16.01%

+12.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

3.13%

+0.72%

Volatility

QVOY vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) is 4.27%, while iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that QVOY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVOYIAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

7.03%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

12.43%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

16.00%

+2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

18.13%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

20.92%

-5.56%

QVOY vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVOY has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVOY vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison

QVOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.58%, more than IAK's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
2.43%1.69%1.49%1.44%1.69%2.26%2.07%1.84%2.33%1.62%1.68%1.62%
QVOY
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
8.58%9.30%10.88%6.03%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVOY and IAK have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAK has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to QVOY (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVOY dropped -17.05% vs IAK's -77.38%.

On 3-year performance, IAK leads with 19.72% vs 9.09% for QVOY. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QVOY has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IAK has performed better with a 19.72% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAK is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QVOY.

QVOY has the higher dividend yield at 8.58%, compared with 2.43% for IAK.

QVOY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while IAK is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Q3 and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QVOY and 0.38% for IAK.

IAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVOY and IAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer