QVOY vs. MDAA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QVOY (Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF) and MDAA (Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVOY charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MDAA.

Performance

QVOY vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVOY achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 16.10% return.

QVOY

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 12.41%
• 1Y: 29.37%
• 3Y*: 13.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MDAA

• 1D: -3.38%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 16.10%
• 6M: 15.40%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVOY vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QVOY Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF	13.62%	1.69%
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	16.10%	-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between QVOY and MDAA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

QVOY vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVOY

QVOY Risk / Return Rank: 56
QVOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QVOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QVOY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QVOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QVOY Martin Ratio Rank: 57

MDAA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVOY vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QVOY	MDAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.30	—	—

Drawdowns

QVOY vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVOY drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVOY and MDAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVOY	MDAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.05%	-14.59%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.98%	-5.99%	+2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-3.04%	-0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QVOY	MDAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.45%	25.25%	-7.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.33%	25.25%	-9.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.33%	25.25%	-9.92%

QVOY vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVOY has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVOY vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison

QVOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than MDAA's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MDAA Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF	0.40%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QVOY Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF	8.19%	9.30%	10.88%	6.03%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVOY and MDAA in my portfolio?

QVOY and MDAA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QVOY or MDAA?

On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVOY or MDAA?

MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QVOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVOY or MDAA?

QVOY has the higher dividend yield at 8.19%, compared with 0.40% for MDAA.

What is the main difference between QVOY and MDAA?

They also come from different issuers: Q3 and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QVOY and 0.97% for MDAA.