QVOY vs. ALLW
QVOY (Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF) and ALLW (SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVOY is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Q3, while ALLW is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QVOY returned 37.19% vs 24.48% for ALLW. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVOY charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ALLW.
Performance
QVOY vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVOY achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly higher than ALLW's 10.04% return.
QVOY
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 7.86%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 21.70%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALLW
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- 24.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVOY vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QVOY Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF | 18.34% | 20.28% |
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | 10.04% | 15.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVOY and ALLW is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between QVOY and ALLW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVOY vs. ALLW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVOY
ALLW
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
QVOY
ALLW
Utilities
QVOY
ALLW
Technology
QVOY
ALLW
Financial Services
QVOY
ALLW
Industrials
QVOY
ALLW
Consumer Cyclical
QVOY
ALLW
Healthcare
QVOY
ALLW
Consumer Defensive
QVOY
ALLW
Real Estate
QVOY
ALLW
Communication Services
QVOY
ALLW
Basic Materials
QVOY
ALLW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVOY vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank
QVOY
ALLW
QVOY vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVOY | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.35 | 2.34 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 3.15 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 3.47 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.55 | 14.77 | -2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVOY | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.34 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.68 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
QVOY vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVOY drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, which is greater than ALLW's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVOY and ALLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVOY | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -8.78% | -8.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -7.23% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.03% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -1.20% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.70% | +1.36% |
Volatility
QVOY vs. ALLW - Volatility Comparison
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW) at 3.36%. This indicates that QVOY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVOY | ALLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 3.36% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 8.69% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 10.50% | +5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 12.54% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 12.54% | +2.39% |
QVOY vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVOY has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVOY vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison
QVOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than ALLW's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALLW SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF | 4.25% | 4.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QVOY Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF | 7.86% | 9.30% | 10.88% | 6.03% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVOY and ALLW have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVOY has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to ALLW (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVOY dropped -17.05% vs ALLW's -8.78%.
On 1-year performance, QVOY leads with 37.19% vs 24.48% for ALLW. On fees, ALLW is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, ALLW has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QVOY has performed better with a 37.19% return vs 24.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ALLW is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QVOY.
QVOY has the higher dividend yield at 7.86%, compared with 4.25% for ALLW.
QVOY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ALLW is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Q3 and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QVOY and 0.85% for ALLW.
QVOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVOY and ALLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer