PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVOY vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVOY vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVOY achieves a 17.87% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 21.95% return.


QVOY

1D
-0.40%
1M
7.72%
YTD
17.87%
6M
19.53%
1Y
36.83%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
10Y*

CTAP

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.24%
YTD
21.95%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVOY vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QVOY and CTAP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.37

QVOY vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVOY
CTAP

Energy

19.3%

-

Utilities

18.7%

-

Technology

15.3%

-

Financial Services

11.4%
49.3%

Industrials

9.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%

-

Healthcare

5.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.6%

-

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Communication Services

3.1%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Energy

QVOY
19.3%
CTAP

-

Utilities

QVOY
18.7%
CTAP

-

Technology

QVOY
15.3%
CTAP

-

Financial Services

QVOY
11.4%
CTAP
49.3%

Industrials

QVOY
9.9%
CTAP

-

Consumer Cyclical

QVOY
6.5%
CTAP

-

Healthcare

QVOY
5.8%
CTAP

-

Consumer Defensive

QVOY
3.6%
CTAP

-

Real Estate

QVOY
3.5%
CTAP

-

Communication Services

QVOY
3.1%
CTAP

-

Basic Materials

QVOY
3.0%
CTAP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVOY vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVOY
QVOY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QVOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVOY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QVOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVOY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVOY vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF (QVOY) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVOYCTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.07

QVOY vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVOYCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

2.50

-1.49

Drawdowns

QVOY vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVOY drawdown since its inception was -17.05%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVOY and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVOYCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-9.02%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-4.47%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-2.18%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

Volatility

QVOY vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVOYCTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

23.94%

-8.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

23.94%

-9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

23.94%

-9.01%

QVOY vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVOY has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVOY vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

QVOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than CTAP's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CTAP
Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF
0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVOY
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
7.89%9.30%10.88%6.03%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVOY and CTAP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QVOY.

QVOY has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.65% for CTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Q3 and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QVOY and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVOY and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer