QVMT vs. FFLC

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

QVMT (Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF) and FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMT is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index, while FFLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. QVMT is passively managed, while FFLC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QVMT returned 13.19%/yr vs 15.99%/yr for FFLC. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVMT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLC.

Performance

QVMT vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly higher than FFLC's 9.35% return.

QVMT

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 21.53%
• 6M: 20.96%
• 1Y: 37.48%
• 3Y*: 23.47%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: 13.51%

FFLC

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 22.88%
• 3Y*: 22.43%
• 5Y*: 15.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMT vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF	21.53%	19.08%	14.40%	11.71%	-5.61%	35.27%	15.72%
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	9.35%	17.67%	27.89%	25.07%	-0.04%	24.53%	19.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMT and FFLC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between QVMT and FFLC has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QVMT vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMT

QVMT Risk / Return Rank: 92
QVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
QVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
QVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
QVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FFLC

FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 58
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMT vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QVMT	FFLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	1.71	+1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	2.35	+1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.31	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.02	2.30	+3.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.04	10.21	+10.83

QVMT vs. FFLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMT and FFLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QVMT vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and FFLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVMT	FFLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.05%	-19.72%	-28.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.25%	-9.98%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.42%	-19.72%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.95%	-19.72%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-2.21%	+1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-2.97%	-3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	2.25%	-0.46%

Volatility

QVMT vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) at 5.23%. This indicates that QVMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QVMT	FFLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	5.23%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	10.65%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.41%	13.48%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	16.99%	+0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	17.67%	+3.44%

QVMT vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVMT vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than FFLC's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	1.00%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF	1.79%	2.42%	2.71%	3.05%	2.49%	2.31%	2.70%	2.23%	2.48%	2.37%	1.11%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVMT and FFLC in my portfolio?

QVMT and FFLC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QVMT or FFLC?

QVMT has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to FFLC (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMT dropped -48.05% vs FFLC's -19.72%.

Which ETF is better, QVMT or FFLC?

On 5-year performance, FFLC leads with 15.99% vs 13.19% for QVMT. On fees, QVMT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FFLC has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QVMT or FFLC?

Over the 5-year period, FFLC has performed better with a 15.99% return vs 13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVMT or FFLC?

QVMT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVMT or FFLC?

QVMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.00% for FFLC.

What is the main difference between QVMT and FFLC?

QVMT is categorized as S&P 500, while FFLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for QVMT and 0.38% for FFLC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.