QVMT vs. PBFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR).
QVMT and PBFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QVMT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Multi-factor Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2015. PBFR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024.
Performance
QVMT vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QVMT vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 4.72% | 19.08% | 6.17% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | -0.75% | 10.44% | 5.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMT achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly higher than PBFR's -0.75% return.
QVMT
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
PBFR
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVMT vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QVMT vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
QVMT
PBFR
QVMT vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMT | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.99 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.84 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.47 | 10.86 | -4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMT | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.20 | -0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMT and PBFR is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QVMT vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
QVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMT Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF | 2.30% | 2.42% | 2.71% | 3.05% | 2.49% | 2.31% | 2.70% | 2.23% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QVMT vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.05%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMT and PBFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMT | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.05% | -8.50% | -39.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -6.15% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.21% | -1.56% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -0.68% | -5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 1.04% | +1.91% |
Volatility
QVMT vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P S&P 500 Concentrated QVM ETF (QVMT) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 2.42%. This indicates that QVMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QVMT | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 2.42% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 3.46% | +6.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 8.18% | +8.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 7.13% | +10.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 7.13% | +13.95% |