PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVMS vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVMS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMS achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 20.71% return.


QVMS

1D
1.27%
1M
2.14%
YTD
17.44%
6M
16.16%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
8.66%
YTD
20.71%
6M
19.19%
1Y
40.74%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.86%
10Y*
21.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
17.44%5.56%9.50%16.89%-14.61%4.45%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
20.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMS and QQQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.65

The correlation between QVMS and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVMS vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVMS
QQQ

Financial Services

18.3%
0.2%

Industrials

16.7%
2.8%

Technology

15.5%
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
12.3%

Healthcare

10.8%
4.2%

Energy

7.5%
0.6%

Real Estate

7.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

4.5%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
7.7%

Utilities

2.1%
1.4%

Communication Services

1.7%
15.8%

Financial Services

QVMS
18.3%
QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

QVMS
16.7%
QQQ
2.8%

Technology

QVMS
15.5%
QQQ
53.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QVMS
13.2%
QQQ
12.3%

Healthcare

QVMS
10.8%
QQQ
4.2%

Energy

QVMS
7.5%
QQQ
0.6%

Real Estate

QVMS
7.1%
QQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

QVMS
4.5%
QQQ
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

QVMS
2.6%
QQQ
7.7%

Utilities

QVMS
2.1%
QQQ
1.4%

Communication Services

QVMS
1.7%
QQQ
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVMS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMS
QVMS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QVMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.42

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

13.14

-0.07

QVMS vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMS and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.57

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.41

-0.06

Drawdowns

QVMS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMS drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMS and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.05%

-82.97%

+54.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-11.96%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.05%

-22.77%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-32.78%

+23.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.11%

-0.51%

Volatility

QVMS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 4.68% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVMSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

4.51%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

12.10%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

15.94%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

22.37%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.25%

22.29%

-1.04%

QVMS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QVMS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

QVMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.12%1.10%1.53%1.51%1.58%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVMS and QQQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVMS has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMS dropped -28.05% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.54% vs 16.26% for QVMS. On fees, QVMS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.54% return vs 16.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVMS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

QVMS has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

QVMS is categorized as Multi-factor, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. QVMS tracks S&P Small Cap 600, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMS and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVMS and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer