QVMM vs. PPA
QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PPA is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMM returned 16.65%/yr vs 28.92%/yr for PPA. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PPA.
Performance
QVMM vs. PPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than PPA's 8.54% return.
QVMM
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 26.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPA
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- 28.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
QVMM vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 14.47% | 8.82% | 13.36% | 15.43% | -13.06% | 6.04% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.54% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | -3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMM and PPA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between QVMM and PPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QVMM vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVMM
PPA
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Industrials
QVMM
PPA
Financial Services
QVMM
PPA
-
Technology
QVMM
PPA
Consumer Cyclical
QVMM
PPA
-
Healthcare
QVMM
PPA
-
Real Estate
QVMM
PPA
-
Energy
QVMM
PPA
-
Basic Materials
QVMM
PPA
-
Consumer Defensive
QVMM
PPA
-
Utilities
QVMM
PPA
-
Communication Services
QVMM
PPA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMM vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank
QVMM
PPA
QVMM vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMM | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 1.95 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | 5.68 | +5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMM | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.40 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.66 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
QVMM vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and PPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMM | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -57.37% | +33.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -13.71% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.00% | -15.24% | -8.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.40% | +8.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -9.18% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 4.69% | -2.39% |
Volatility
QVMM vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) is 4.63%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that QVMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMM | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 6.73% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 15.95% | -4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 19.03% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 18.49% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 20.64% | -1.16% |
QVMM vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVMM vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison
QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than PPA's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.39% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.16% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMM and PPA have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to QVMM (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs PPA's -57.37%.
On 3-year performance, PPA leads with 28.92% vs 16.65% for QVMM. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMM has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PPA has performed better with a 28.92% return vs 16.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PPA.
QVMM has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.39% for PPA.
QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while PPA is Industrials Equities. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.61% for PPA.
QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMM and PPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer