QVMM vs. JETD
QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and JETD (MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while JETD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QVMM returned 26.39% vs -63.32% for JETD. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. QVMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for JETD.
Performance
QVMM vs. JETD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than JETD's -28.36% return.
QVMM
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 26.39%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETD
- 1D
- 6.89%
- 1M
- -26.54%
- YTD
- -28.36%
- 6M
- -38.79%
- 1Y
- -63.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVMM vs. JETD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 14.47% | 8.82% | 13.36% | 9.77% |
JETD MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -28.36% | -59.89% | -51.72% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMM and JETD is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | -0.73 |
The correlation between QVMM and JETD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMM vs. JETD — Risk / Return Rank
QVMM
JETD
QVMM vs. JETD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVMM | JETD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.84 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | -0.88 | +4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | -1.35 | +12.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVMM | JETD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | -0.88 | +2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.70 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
QVMM vs. JETD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum JETD drawdown of -93.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and JETD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMM | JETD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -93.69% | +69.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -71.95% | +63.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -92.55% | +92.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -61.36% | +54.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 46.84% | -44.54% |
Volatility
QVMM vs. JETD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) is 4.63%, while MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD) has a volatility of 28.81%. This indicates that QVMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JETD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMM | JETD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 28.81% | -24.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 58.96% | -47.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 72.36% | -57.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 70.51% | -51.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 70.51% | -51.03% |
QVMM vs. JETD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JETD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVMM vs. JETD - Dividend Comparison
QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while JETD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETD MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.16% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMM and JETD have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JETD has higher volatility (28.81%) compared to QVMM (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs JETD's -93.69%.
On 1-year performance, QVMM leads with 26.39% vs -63.32% for JETD. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMM has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QVMM has performed better with a 26.39% return vs -63.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for JETD.
QVMM has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for JETD.
QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while JETD is Inverse Equities. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while JETD tracks Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.95% for JETD.
QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMM and JETD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer