QVMM vs. CMDT
QVMM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMM is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMM returned 16.66%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for CMDT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QVMM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.
Performance
QVMM vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVMM achieves a 15.32% return, which is significantly higher than CMDT's 13.43% return.
QVMM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 15.32%
- 6M
- 13.35%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDT
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVMM vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 15.32% | 8.82% | 13.36% | 14.92% |
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 13.43% | 12.78% | 6.93% | 5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVMM and CMDT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2023 | 0.10 |
The correlation between QVMM and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVMM vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank
QVMM
CMDT
QVMM vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVMM | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 1.93 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.53 | 9.62 | +1.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVMM vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVMM drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMM and CMDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVMM | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -11.11% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -11.11% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.00% | -11.11% | -12.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -11.11% | +10.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -2.77% | -4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 2.25% | +0.06% |
Volatility
QVMM vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) at 3.26%. This indicates that QVMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVMM | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.26% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 10.60% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 12.65% | +2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 12.24% | +7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 12.24% | +7.22% |
QVMM vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVMM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVMM vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison
QVMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than CMDT's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 2.67% | 3.04% | 8.80% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QVMM Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.15% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVMM and CMDT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVMM has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to CMDT (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMM dropped -24.00% vs CMDT's -11.11%.
On 3-year performance, QVMM leads with 16.66% vs 12.77% for CMDT. On fees, QVMM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CMDT has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QVMM has performed better with a 16.66% return vs 12.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVMM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.
CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.15% for QVMM.
QVMM is categorized as Multi-factor, while CMDT is Commodities. QVMM tracks S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CMDT tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMM and 0.65% for CMDT.
QVMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVMM and CMDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer