PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVML vs. USMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QVML vs. USMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QVML vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
-4.47%17.74%25.87%22.19%-16.25%12.56%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
-3.32%4.60%19.65%13.47%-8.82%7.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than USMF's -3.32% return.


QVML

1D
2.74%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
-4.47%
6M
-2.01%
1Y
15.56%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
10Y*

USMF

1D
1.60%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
-4.86%
1Y
0.89%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVML vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QVML vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML
QVML Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QVML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVML Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVML Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QVML Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVML Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

USMF
USMF Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVML vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMLUSMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

0.06

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

0.19

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.03

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.13

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.20

0.54

+5.66

QVML vs. USMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the USMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and USMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMLUSMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.06

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.58

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and USMF is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QVML vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than USMF's 1.42% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.15%1.10%1.15%1.43%1.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
1.42%1.37%1.22%1.33%1.74%1.42%1.34%1.38%1.45%0.67%

Drawdowns

QVML vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and USMF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMLUSMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-36.24%

+12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

-11.36%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-4.96%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-4.22%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.73%

-0.09%

Volatility

QVML vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) at 3.43%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QVMLUSMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

3.43%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

7.76%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

15.33%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

14.30%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

17.08%

-0.34%