PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVML vs. HYMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QVML vs. HYMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QVML vs. HYMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
-3.64%17.74%25.87%22.19%-16.25%12.56%
HYMU
BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF
0.29%2.58%6.99%9.67%-15.96%0.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly lower than HYMU's 0.29% return.


QVML

1D
0.88%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
-3.64%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
10Y*

HYMU

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
0.29%
6M
1.40%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVML vs. HYMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMU's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QVML vs. HYMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVML
QVML Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QVML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVML Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVML Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QVML Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVML Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMU
HYMU Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HYMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMU Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMU Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVML vs. HYMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMLHYMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.20

+0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

0.30

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.07

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.31

+0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.24

1.53

+4.70

QVML vs. HYMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVML Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the HYMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVML and HYMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMLHYMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.20

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.23

+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between QVML and HYMU is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QVML vs. HYMU - Dividend Comparison

QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than HYMU's 4.51% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.14%1.10%1.15%1.43%1.72%0.62%
HYMU
BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF
4.51%4.55%4.35%4.35%4.01%2.97%

Drawdowns

QVML vs. HYMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, roughly equal to the maximum HYMU drawdown of -22.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and HYMU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMLHYMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-22.55%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.97%

-6.54%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.40%

-1.39%

-4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-6.97%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.37%

+1.29%

Volatility

QVML vs. HYMU - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU) at 1.29%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QVMLHYMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

1.29%

+3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

1.81%

+7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

7.95%

+10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

7.08%

+9.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

7.05%

+9.68%