QVML vs. SOXQ
QVML (Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVML is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVML returned 22.47%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVML charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
QVML vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
QVML
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- 27.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVML vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 11.17% | 17.74% | 25.87% | 22.19% | -16.25% | 12.56% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 19.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVML and SOXQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QVML and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVML vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVML
SOXQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QVML
SOXQ
Financial Services
QVML
SOXQ
Communication Services
QVML
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
QVML
SOXQ
-
Industrials
QVML
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
QVML
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
QVML
SOXQ
-
Energy
QVML
SOXQ
-
Utilities
QVML
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
QVML
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
QVML
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVML vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
QVML
SOXQ
QVML vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVML | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.72 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 11.73 | -8.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.85 | 45.01 | -30.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVML | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 5.43 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.98 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
QVML vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVML | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -46.01% | +22.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -15.59% | +6.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.71% | -39.36% | +20.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -12.96% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 4.06% | -2.20% |
Volatility
QVML vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is 2.91%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that QVML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVML | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 13.44% | -10.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 26.70% | -17.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 33.78% | -22.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 36.38% | -19.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 36.38% | -19.79% |
QVML vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QVML vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.72% | 0.62% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVML and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to QVML (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVML dropped -23.52% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 22.47% for QVML. On fees, QVML is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, QVML has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 22.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVML is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.
QVML has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
QVML is categorized as Multi-factor, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. QVML tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for QVML and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVML and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer