QVML vs. FNILX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX).
QVML is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality, Value &Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. FNILX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
QVML vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QVML vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | -4.47% | 17.74% | 25.87% | 22.19% | -16.25% | 12.56% |
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund | -7.30% | 17.81% | 25.47% | 27.45% | -19.37% | 10.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QVML achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's -7.30% return.
QVML
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 6M
- -2.01%
- 1Y
- 15.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNILX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -7.60%
- YTD
- -7.30%
- 6M
- -5.00%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QVML vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVML has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QVML vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank
QVML
FNILX
QVML vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QVML | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.83 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.04 | +0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 5.01 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QVML | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.83 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.64 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between QVML and FNILX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QVML vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison
QVML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than FNILX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVML Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF | 1.15% | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 0.95% | 1.20% | 1.17% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
QVML vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVML drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVML and FNILX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVML | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.52% | -33.76% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -12.18% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -9.01% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -5.47% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.54% | +0.10% |
Volatility
QVML vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 4.23%. This indicates that QVML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QVML | FNILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 4.23% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 9.14% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.56% | 18.26% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 17.22% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 20.17% | -3.43% |