PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. SYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVAL achieves a 18.22% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 21.10% return. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has underperformed SYLD with an annualized return of 11.61%, while SYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.51% annualized return.


QVAL

1D
0.99%
1M
1.96%
6M
11.79%
YTD
18.22%
1Y
33.56%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
11.61%

SYLD

1D
1.89%
1M
5.16%
6M
13.57%
YTD
21.10%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
13.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
18.22%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
21.10%3.94%3.37%16.46%-6.14%48.59%13.61%26.98%-13.51%20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and SYLD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.89

The correlation between QVAL and SYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVAL vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
SYLD

Consumer Cyclical

23.8%
23.5%

Energy

16.1%
17.1%

Industrials

14.1%
8.3%

Healthcare

13.9%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
6.7%

Technology

8.3%
2.1%

Communication Services

6.0%
6.0%

Basic Materials

6.0%
8.0%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Financial Services

-

22.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
23.8%
SYLD
23.5%

Energy

QVAL
16.1%
SYLD
17.1%

Industrials

QVAL
14.1%
SYLD
8.3%

Healthcare

QVAL
13.9%
SYLD
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
9.8%
SYLD
6.7%

Technology

QVAL
8.3%
SYLD
2.1%

Communication Services

QVAL
6.0%
SYLD
6.0%

Basic Materials

QVAL
6.0%
SYLD
8.0%

Utilities

QVAL
2.0%
SYLD

-

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
SYLD

-

Financial Services

QVAL

-

SYLD
22.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QVALSYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.59

4.23

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.95

11.44

+4.51

QVAL vs. SYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the SYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and SYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than SYLD's maximum drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and SYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALSYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-45.36%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-6.93%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-26.62%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-26.62%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-45.36%

-6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-5.62%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.56%

-0.45%

Volatility

QVAL vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is 3.34%, while Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that QVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALSYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.70%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

9.54%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

15.31%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

20.35%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

22.90%

-0.21%

QVAL vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than SYLD's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.45%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.83%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and SYLD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYLD has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to QVAL (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs SYLD's -45.36%.

On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.51% vs 11.61% for QVAL. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.

SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.45% for QVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.59% for SYLD.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and SYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer