PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVAL vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QVAL having a 14.17% return and SPHQ slightly lower at 13.62%. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.40%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.79% annualized return.


QVAL

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.77%
YTD
14.17%
6M
15.05%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
11.40%

SPHQ

1D
-2.19%
1M
3.69%
YTD
13.62%
6M
14.14%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.17%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
13.62%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QVAL and SPHQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.72

The correlation between QVAL and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QVAL
SPHQ

Consumer Cyclical

32.4%
4.6%

Technology

16.7%
28.1%

Industrials

15.0%
24.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
15.4%

Basic Materials

7.6%
2.2%

Energy

5.5%
0.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Financial Services

-

13.3%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QVAL
32.4%
SPHQ
4.6%

Technology

QVAL
16.7%
SPHQ
28.1%

Industrials

QVAL
15.0%
SPHQ
24.3%

Healthcare

QVAL
11.1%
SPHQ
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

QVAL
7.9%
SPHQ
15.4%

Basic Materials

QVAL
7.6%
SPHQ
2.2%

Energy

QVAL
5.5%
SPHQ
0.7%

Communication Services

QVAL
3.8%
SPHQ
2.0%

Real Estate

QVAL
2.0%
SPHQ

-

Financial Services

QVAL

-

SPHQ
13.3%

Utilities

QVAL

-

SPHQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QVAL vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVALSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

2.42

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

10.27

+3.90

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVAL and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVALSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.68

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.86

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.83

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.53

-0.04

Drawdowns

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QVALSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.49%

-57.83%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-8.90%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-16.57%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-25.04%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-31.60%

-19.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-2.19%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-10.70%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.09%

+0.04%

Volatility

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QVALSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.03%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.03%

10.44%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.43%

12.83%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.63%

16.47%

+5.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

17.87%

+4.92%

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QVAL vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than SPHQ's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.47%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.06%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


QVAL and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SPHQ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.79% vs 11.40% for QVAL. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.79% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.06% for SPHQ.

QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.15% for SPHQ.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QVAL and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer