QVAL vs. SPHQ
QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVAL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. QVAL is actively managed, while SPHQ is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QVAL returned 12.39%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QVAL charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
QVAL vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QVAL having a 16.06% return and SPHQ slightly higher at 16.43%. Over the past 10 years, QVAL has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 12.39%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
QVAL
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
SPHQ
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 16.43%
- 6M
- 14.48%
- 1Y
- 24.14%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
QVAL vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 16.06% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 34.40% | -5.93% | 24.06% | -17.28% | 25.59% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.43% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between QVAL and SPHQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between QVAL and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
QVAL vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QVAL
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
QVAL
SPHQ
Energy
QVAL
SPHQ
Industrials
QVAL
SPHQ
Healthcare
QVAL
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
QVAL
SPHQ
Technology
QVAL
SPHQ
Communication Services
QVAL
SPHQ
Basic Materials
QVAL
SPHQ
Utilities
QVAL
SPHQ
Real Estate
QVAL
SPHQ
-
Financial Services
QVAL
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QVAL vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
QVAL
SPHQ
QVAL vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QVAL | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.83 | +2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 12.03 | +1.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QVAL vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QVAL drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVAL and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QVAL | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -57.83% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -8.90% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -16.57% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -25.04% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.49% | -31.60% | -19.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -3.02% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -10.67% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.09% | +0.07% |
Volatility
QVAL vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) is 3.76%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that QVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QVAL | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 6.28% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 11.58% | -1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 13.60% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 16.62% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 17.91% | +4.83% |
QVAL vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QVAL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QVAL vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
QVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.14% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QVAL and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to QVAL (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVAL dropped -51.49% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.50% vs 12.39% for QVAL. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 12.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QVAL.
QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.07% for SPHQ.
QVAL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QVAL and 0.15% for SPHQ.
QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QVAL and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer