QUSA vs. VOO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).

QUSA and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QUSA is an actively managed fund by VistaShares. It was launched on May 5, 2025. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.

Performance

QUSA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QUSA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	-1.50%	-3.15%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	-4.42%	23.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUSA achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return.

QUSA

• 1D: 2.74%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: -1.50%
• 6M: -5.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -5.01%
• YTD: -4.42%
• 6M: -1.84%
• 1Y: 17.67%
• 3Y*: 18.27%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: 14.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUSA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUSA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

QUSA

VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF

VOO

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Return for Risk

QUSA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 65
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUSA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QUSA	VOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.50	0.83	-1.33

Correlation

The correlation between QUSA and VOO is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QUSA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	10.88%	6.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.19%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Drawdowns

QUSA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUSA drawdown since its inception was -10.64%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUSA and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUSA	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-33.99%	+23.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.19%	-6.29%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-3.72%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QUSA	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.31%	18.10%	-7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.31%	16.82%	-6.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.31%	17.99%	-7.68%