QUSA vs. SPY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QUSA (VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QUSA is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by VistaShares, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QUSA is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past year, QUSA returned 5.22% vs 21.49% for SPY. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QUSA charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.

Performance

QUSA vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUSA achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.13% return.

QUSA

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: 6.29%
• YTD: 8.12%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.70%

SPY

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 8.53%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 21.49%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: 15.07%
• ALL TIME*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	$284.17K	$298.42K	$273.69K
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	$37.27B	$35.99B	$39.23B

QUSA vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	8.12%	-3.27%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	10.13%	22.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QUSA and SPY is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2025	0.75

The correlation between QUSA and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QUSA vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QUSA

QUSA Risk / Return Rank: 18
QUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
QUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 18
QUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
QUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 18

SPY

SPY Risk / Return Rank: 67
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QUSA vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QUSA	SPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.52	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.11	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.27	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.20	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.05	9.40	-8.35

QUSA vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUSA and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QUSA vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUSA drawdown since its inception was -10.64%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUSA and SPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUSA	SPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-55.19%	+44.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.49%	-8.88%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.15%	-1.40%	-1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.59%	-9.01%	+5.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.76%	2.08%	+1.68%

Volatility

QUSA vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF (QUSA) is 2.92%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that QUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QUSA	SPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	3.58%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.96%	10.14%	-1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.95%	12.89%	-1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.75%	17.18%	-6.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.75%	17.95%	-7.20%

QUSA vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUSA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

QUSA vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

QUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.54%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QUSA VistaShares Target 15™ USA Quality Income ETF	15.54%	6.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF	1.01%	1.07%	1.21%	1.40%	1.65%	1.20%	1.52%	1.75%	2.04%	1.80%	2.03%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUSA and SPY in my portfolio?

QUSA and SPY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QUSA or SPY?

SPY has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to QUSA (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUSA dropped -10.64% vs SPY's -55.19%.

Which ETF is better, QUSA or SPY?

On 1-year performance, SPY leads with 21.49% vs 5.22% for QUSA. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QUSA or SPY?

Over the 1-year period, SPY has performed better with a 21.49% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUSA or SPY?

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUSA or SPY?

QUSA has the higher dividend yield at 15.54%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

What is the main difference between QUSA and SPY?

QUSA is categorized as Quality Factor, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QUSA and 0.09% for SPY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.