PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUS vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QUS vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QUS vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
-1.46%14.13%18.99%7.60%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
4.29%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUS achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 4.29% return.


QUS

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
-1.46%
6M
1.09%
1Y
11.14%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
12.88%

DARP

1D
3.09%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
4.29%
6M
13.93%
1Y
64.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QUS vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QUS vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUS vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUSDARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

2.19

-1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

2.73

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.39

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

3.97

-2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.79

16.42

-10.63

QUS vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUS and DARP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUSDARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.19

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.11

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between QUS and DARP is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QUS vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than DARP's 0.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.40%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.42%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QUS vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUS drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUS and DARP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QUSDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-30.27%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-15.92%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-9.09%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-4.84%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

3.85%

-1.74%

Volatility

QUS vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is 3.79%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that QUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QUSDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

9.51%

-5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

19.28%

-12.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

29.51%

-15.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

26.42%

-12.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

26.42%

-10.01%