QUBT vs. IAK
QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) is a stock, while IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Over the past 5 years, QUBT returned 9.88%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for IAK. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QUBT vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than IAK's 1.11% return.
QUBT
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -17.59%
- 1Y
- -43.29%
- 3Y*
- 77.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IAK
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
QUBT vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | -3.22% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -55.72% | -75.83% | 370.33% | 0.00% | -42.31% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBT and IAK is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBT vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
QUBT
IAK
QUBT vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBT | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.06 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.57 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 1.27 | -2.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBT vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than IAK's maximum drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBT | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -77.38% | -20.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.37% | -7.62% | -66.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.40% | -11.58% | -70.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | -14.76% | -80.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.33% | -0.23% | -61.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.90% | -16.11% | -56.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.67% | 3.41% | +45.26% |
Volatility
QUBT vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a higher volatility of 33.55% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 5.49%. This indicates that QUBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBT | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.55% | 5.49% | +28.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.37% | 10.75% | +56.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.81% | 15.10% | +88.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.05% | 18.14% | +114.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 177.48% | 20.92% | +156.56% |
Dividends
QUBT vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
QUBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.60% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBT and IAK have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBT has higher volatility (33.55%) compared to IAK (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs IAK's -77.38%.
IAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBT and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer