QUAL vs. QLV
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index while QLV tracks the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QUAL returned 11.26%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for QLV. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for QLV.
Performance
QUAL vs. QLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 9.55% return.
QUAL
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 22.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.75%
QLV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $571.44K | $481.55K | $516.78K | |
| $217.13M | $238.90M | $384.89M |
QUAL vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 12.08% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 30.88% | -20.50% | 26.94% | 17.04% | 8.61% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 9.55% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and QLV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QUAL and QLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QUAL vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
QLV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QUAL
QLV
Financial Services
QUAL
QLV
Communication Services
QUAL
QLV
Healthcare
QUAL
QLV
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
QLV
Industrials
QUAL
QLV
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
QLV
Energy
QUAL
QLV
Utilities
QUAL
QLV
Basic Materials
QUAL
QLV
Real Estate
QUAL
QLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
QLV
QUAL vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUAL | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 2.71 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | 11.17 | +0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, roughly equal to the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and QLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -33.71% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -6.19% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -12.05% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -17.93% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -3.93% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 1.50% | +0.51% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.30%. This indicates that QUAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 2.30% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 5.98% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.33% | 7.88% | +4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 12.64% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 16.43% | +1.67% |
QUAL vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUAL vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than QLV's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.85% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and QLV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUAL has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to QLV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs QLV's -33.71%.
On 5-year performance, QUAL leads with 11.26% vs 10.05% for QLV. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for QLV.
QLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.85% for QUAL.
QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.22% for QLV.
QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and QLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer