PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. QLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUAL vs. QLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly higher than QLV's 9.55% return.


QUAL

1D
1.10%
1M
1.52%
6M
9.27%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
14.16%
ALL TIME*
13.75%

QLV

1D
0.50%
1M
1.91%
6M
6.89%
YTD
9.55%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$571.44K$481.55K$516.78K
$217.13M$238.90M$384.89M

QUAL vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
12.08%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%8.61%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
9.55%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and QLV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.89

The correlation between QUAL and QLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QUAL vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUAL
QLV

Technology

40.2%
30.2%

Financial Services

10.9%
12.3%

Communication Services

10.3%
7.4%

Healthcare

9.2%
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
6.4%

Industrials

7.4%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
7.8%

Energy

2.9%
6.5%

Utilities

2.1%
6.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.4%

Technology

QUAL
40.2%
QLV
30.2%

Financial Services

QUAL
10.9%
QLV
12.3%

Communication Services

QUAL
10.3%
QLV
7.4%

Healthcare

QUAL
9.2%
QLV
14.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.0%
QLV
6.4%

Industrials

QUAL
7.4%
QLV
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.3%
QLV
7.8%

Energy

QUAL
2.9%
QLV
6.5%

Utilities

QUAL
2.1%
QLV
6.4%

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.9%
QLV
1.3%

Real Estate

QUAL
1.7%
QLV
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUAL vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QUAL vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUALQLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.71

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

11.17

+0.16

QUAL vs. QLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the QLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and QLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, roughly equal to the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and QLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUALQLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-33.71%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-6.19%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-12.05%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-17.93%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-3.93%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.50%

+0.51%

Volatility

QUAL vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 2.30%. This indicates that QUAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUALQLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

2.30%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

5.98%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

7.88%

+4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

12.64%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

16.43%

+1.67%

QUAL vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUAL vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than QLV's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.85%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUAL and QLV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUAL has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to QLV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs QLV's -33.71%.

On 5-year performance, QUAL leads with 11.26% vs 10.05% for QLV. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for QLV.

QLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.85% for QUAL.

QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.22% for QLV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and QLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer