PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. LRGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUAL vs. LRGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (LRGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QUAL having a 12.08% return and LRGF slightly lower at 11.51%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QUAL having a 14.16% annualized return and LRGF not far behind at 13.77%.


QUAL

1D
1.10%
1M
1.52%
6M
9.27%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
11.26%
10Y*
14.16%
ALL TIME*
13.75%

LRGF

1D
1.21%
1M
2.22%
6M
10.50%
YTD
11.51%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
13.77%
ALL TIME*
12.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.32M$10.06M$11.77M
$217.13M$238.90M$384.89M

QUAL vs. LRGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
12.08%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
LRGF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
11.51%16.48%26.59%25.85%-14.77%25.01%11.11%26.11%-9.66%21.13%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and LRGF is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

0.92

The correlation between QUAL and LRGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

QUAL vs. LRGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUAL
LRGF

Technology

40.2%
37.3%

Financial Services

10.9%
11.7%

Communication Services

10.3%
10.0%

Healthcare

9.2%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
10.5%

Industrials

7.4%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.9%

Energy

2.9%
3.1%

Utilities

2.1%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.1%

Technology

QUAL
40.2%
LRGF
37.3%

Financial Services

QUAL
10.9%
LRGF
11.7%

Communication Services

QUAL
10.3%
LRGF
10.0%

Healthcare

QUAL
9.2%
LRGF
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.0%
LRGF
10.5%

Industrials

QUAL
7.4%
LRGF
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.3%
LRGF
4.9%

Energy

QUAL
2.9%
LRGF
3.1%

Utilities

QUAL
2.1%
LRGF
2.0%

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.9%
LRGF
1.8%

Real Estate

QUAL
1.7%
LRGF
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUAL vs. LRGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LRGF
LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QUAL vs. LRGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (LRGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUALLRGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

2.35

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

9.12

+2.21

QUAL vs. LRGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the LRGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and LRGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. LRGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum LRGF drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and LRGF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUALLRGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-36.03%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.92%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-19.44%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-21.62%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-36.03%

+1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-4.50%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.29%

-0.28%

Volatility

QUAL vs. LRGF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.07%, while iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (LRGF) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUALLRGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.69%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

10.12%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

12.86%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

17.10%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

18.30%

-0.20%

QUAL vs. LRGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGF's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUAL vs. LRGF - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than LRGF's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRGF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
1.06%1.16%1.23%1.49%1.78%1.05%1.35%1.76%3.27%1.68%1.56%0.83%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.85%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, QUAL and LRGF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LRGF has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to QUAL (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs LRGF's -36.03%.

On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.16% vs 13.77% for LRGF. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 13.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LRGF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUAL.

LRGF has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.85% for QUAL.

QUAL is categorized as Quality Factor, while LRGF is Large Cap Blend Equities. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while LRGF tracks STOXX U.S. Equity Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.08% for LRGF.

QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and LRGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer