PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. LRGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QUAL vs. LRGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QUAL vs. LRGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
-2.54%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
-3.97%16.48%26.59%25.85%-14.77%25.01%11.11%26.11%-9.66%21.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a -2.54% return, which is significantly higher than LRGF's -3.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QUAL having a 13.06% annualized return and LRGF not far behind at 12.42%.


QUAL

1D
0.20%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-2.54%
6M
-1.12%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
13.06%

LRGF

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
-3.97%
6M
-3.55%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QUAL vs. LRGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LRGF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QUAL vs. LRGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

LRGF
LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUAL vs. LRGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUALLRGFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

0.81

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.21

1.27

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.28

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.43

5.69

-0.26

QUAL vs. LRGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the LRGF Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and LRGF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUALLRGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.81

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.69

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.68

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.62

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and LRGF is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QUAL vs. LRGF - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than LRGF's 1.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.98%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
1.22%1.16%1.23%1.49%1.78%1.05%1.35%1.76%3.27%1.68%1.56%0.83%

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. LRGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum LRGF drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and LRGF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QUALLRGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-36.03%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.92%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-21.62%

-6.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-36.03%

+1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.78%

-5.55%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-4.60%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.79%

-0.23%

Volatility

QUAL vs. LRGF - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) have volatilities of 5.32% and 5.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QUALLRGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

5.17%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

9.67%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.46%

18.48%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

17.04%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

18.29%

-0.21%