PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUAL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QUAL having a 9.65% return and DGRO slightly lower at 9.64%. Over the past 10 years, QUAL has outperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 14.29%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.34% annualized return.


QUAL

1D
0.79%
1M
4.74%
YTD
9.65%
6M
9.63%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*
14.29%

DGRO

1D
0.81%
1M
3.27%
YTD
9.64%
6M
9.87%
1Y
23.89%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUAL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
9.65%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.64%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and DGRO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.89

The correlation between QUAL and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (3 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QUAL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUAL
DGRO

Technology

36.5%
19.4%

Financial Services

11.5%
21.2%

Communication Services

11.1%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
5.7%

Healthcare

9.0%
16.4%

Industrials

8.2%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.5%

Energy

4.0%
5.6%

Utilities

1.9%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.5%

Technology

QUAL
36.5%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

QUAL
11.5%
DGRO
21.2%

Communication Services

QUAL
11.1%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.3%
DGRO
5.7%

Healthcare

QUAL
9.0%
DGRO
16.4%

Industrials

QUAL
8.2%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.9%
DGRO
11.5%

Energy

QUAL
4.0%
DGRO
5.6%

Utilities

QUAL
1.9%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

QUAL
1.8%
DGRO

-

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.7%
DGRO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUAL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUAL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUALDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.71

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.25

14.33

-3.08

QUAL vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUALDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.53

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.78

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.81

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.77

+0.04

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUALDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-35.10%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-6.47%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-14.03%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-19.31%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

-35.10%

+1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-3.44%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.67%

+0.31%

Volatility

QUAL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.24%. This indicates that QUAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUALDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.24%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

6.94%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

9.49%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

13.82%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

16.62%

+1.47%

QUAL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUAL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than DGRO's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.87%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUAL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUAL has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to DGRO (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.29% vs 13.34% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.29% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUAL.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.

QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer