PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTWO vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTWO vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTWO achieves a -22.98% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, QTWO has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 7.28%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.


QTWO

1D
5.63%
1M
23.16%
6M
-16.80%
YTD
-22.98%
1Y
-38.52%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
-10.91%
10Y*
7.28%

^GSPC

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.49%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTWO vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTWO
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
-22.98%-28.31%131.86%61.56%-66.18%-37.22%56.06%63.63%34.46%27.73%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.05%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QTWO and ^GSPC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2014

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between QTWO and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTWO vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTWO
QTWO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
QTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
QTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTWO vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTWO^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.29

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

2.24

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

9.71

-10.80

QTWO vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTWO Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTWO and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTWO vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTWO drawdown since its inception was -85.77%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTWO and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTWO^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.77%

-56.78%

-28.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.97%

-9.10%

-44.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.03%

-18.90%

-43.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.10%

-25.43%

-54.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.77%

-33.92%

-51.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.11%

-1.00%

-61.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.50%

-10.70%

-19.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.14%

2.09%

+33.05%

Volatility

QTWO vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a higher volatility of 14.67% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.25%. This indicates that QTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTWO^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.67%

3.25%

+11.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.78%

10.00%

+25.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.75%

12.56%

+33.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.49%

17.00%

+33.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.46%

18.05%

+26.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTWO and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTWO has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to ^GSPC (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTWO dropped -85.77% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTWO and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer