PortfoliosLab logo
QTUM vs. FHLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and FHLC is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

QTUM vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
219.66%
57.27%
QTUM
FHLC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QTUM:

1.01

FHLC:

-0.08

Sortino Ratio

QTUM:

1.53

FHLC:

-0.01

Omega Ratio

QTUM:

1.20

FHLC:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

QTUM:

1.30

FHLC:

-0.07

Martin Ratio

QTUM:

4.18

FHLC:

-0.19

Ulcer Index

QTUM:

7.91%

FHLC:

5.94%

Daily Std Dev

QTUM:

32.89%

FHLC:

14.66%

Max Drawdown

QTUM:

-38.45%

FHLC:

-28.76%

Current Drawdown

QTUM:

-13.00%

FHLC:

-11.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a -7.37% return, which is significantly lower than FHLC's -0.46% return.


QTUM

YTD

-7.37%

1M

-3.71%

6M

18.43%

1Y

31.83%

5Y*

24.96%

10Y*

N/A

FHLC

YTD

-0.46%

1M

-4.55%

6M

-7.15%

1Y

-0.01%

5Y*

7.27%

10Y*

7.86%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTUM vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for QTUM: current value is 0.40%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QTUM: 0.40%
Expense ratio chart for FHLC: current value is 0.08%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FHLC: 0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QTUM vs. FHLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QTUM is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FHLC is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FHLC is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QTUM vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
QTUM: 1.01
FHLC: -0.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
QTUM: 1.53
FHLC: -0.01
The chart of Omega ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
QTUM: 1.20
FHLC: 1.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
QTUM: 1.30
FHLC: -0.07
The chart of Martin ratio for QTUM, currently valued at 4.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
QTUM: 4.18
FHLC: -0.19

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and FHLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.01
-0.08
QTUM
FHLC

Dividends

QTUM vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than FHLC's 1.55% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.73%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.45%0.61%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
1.55%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%2.14%1.38%1.40%2.07%1.03%

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and FHLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.00%
-11.72%
QTUM
FHLC

Volatility

QTUM vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 17.66% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 9.43%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.66%
9.43%
QTUM
FHLC