QTUM vs. AGQ
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while AGQ is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 27.09%/yr vs 9.46%/yr for AGQ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.
Performance
QTUM vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 41.40% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -45.64% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- 41.40%
- 6M
- 36.09%
- 1Y
- 75.60%
- 3Y*
- 47.54%
- 5Y*
- 27.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AGQ
- 1D
- -8.53%
- 1M
- -36.83%
- YTD
- -45.64%
- 6M
- -31.28%
- 1Y
- 69.32%
- 3Y*
- 39.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
QTUM vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 41.40% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | -45.64% | 360.71% | 23.92% | -15.09% | -7.89% | -32.25% | 62.02% | 20.02% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and AGQ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
AGQ
QTUM vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.25 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 0.88 | +4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.34 | 1.69 | +16.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 0.57 | +2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.13 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.06 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and AGQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -98.16% | +59.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -78.94% | +63.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -78.94% | +53.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -78.94% | +40.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.30% | -88.46% | +80.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -79.85% | +71.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 41.07% | -36.93% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 13.43%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 35.33%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | AGQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.43% | 35.33% | -21.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.42% | 134.97% | -112.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.76% | 122.14% | -94.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 75.13% | -48.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 65.88% | -38.55% |
QTUM vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.76% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and AGQ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGQ has higher volatility (35.33%) compared to QTUM (13.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs AGQ's -98.16%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 27.09% vs 9.46% for AGQ. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 13.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 27.09% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.93% for AGQ.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for AGQ.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while AGQ is Silver. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while AGQ tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex (200%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.93% for AGQ.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and AGQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer