PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTSSX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTSSX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.13% return.


QTSSX

1D
2.71%
1M
12.39%
YTD
17.70%
6M
14.66%
1Y
40.42%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
-3.91%
10Y*

QBDSX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.13%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTSSX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
17.70%4.10%13.88%13.97%-27.55%-16.61%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.13%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between QTSSX and QBDSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021

0.34

The correlation between QTSSX and QBDSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (5 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTSSX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTSSX
QTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTSSX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTSSXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

0.56

+1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

0.83

+1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.10

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

0.65

+2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.80

1.83

+7.96

QTSSX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTSSX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTSSXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

0.56

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.18

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.16

-0.19

Drawdowns

QTSSX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTSSXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.27%

-18.38%

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-3.09%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-3.76%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.27%

-7.40%

-44.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.37%

-7.94%

-10.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.89%

-6.85%

-29.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

1.09%

+3.11%

Volatility

QTSSX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.67%. This indicates that QTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTSSXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.40%

0.67%

+7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

2.39%

+12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

3.60%

+16.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

4.32%

+18.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

5.26%

+18.39%

QTSSX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTSSX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than QBDSX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.47%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
0.38%0.45%0.00%6.30%0.19%3.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTSSX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTSSX has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to QBDSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTSSX dropped -52.27% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

QTSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTSSX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer